GPR177 promotes gastric cancer proliferation by suppressing endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced cell death.

Gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer worldwide. Despite the high incidence of gastric cancer, efficient chemotherapy treatments still need to be developed. In this study, we examined the anticancer effects of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress inducer tunicamycin in gastric cancer. Previously, we found that overexpression of WLS1/GPR177 correlated with poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. Furthermore, tunicamycin treatment downregulated GPR177 expression in a dose-dependent manner. GPR177 transports WNT ligand from ER to the plasma membrane, mediating its secretion to the extracellular matrix. In gastric cancer cells, GPR177 preferentially localizes to the ER. Small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of GPR177 leads to sensitization to ER stress and induces apoptosis of cancer cells along with tunicamycin treatment. GPR177 suppression promoted the ER stress-mediated proapoptotic pathway, such as PERK-CHOP cascade. Furthermore, fluorouracil treatment combined with tunicamycin dramatically reduced cancer cell proliferation. Efficacy of tunicamycin chemotherapy treatments depended on GPR177 expression in gastric cancer cell lines. Together, our results indicate that ER stress can potentiate anticancer effects and suggest GPR177 as a potential gastric cancer therapeutic target.

Expression of MUC2 in gastric carcinomas and background mucosae.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Gastric carcinomas contain elements of both intestinal and diffuse types. Such heterogeneous components may distort the evaluation of the role of the mucin MUC2 in gastric carcinoma. The role of MUC2 expression in background mucosa is not yet clarified. METHODS: We analyzed the expression of MUC2 in gastric mucosa and intestinal metaplasia adjacent to the tumoral area and carcinomas (n = 98) using immunohistochemistry. The immunoreactivity was quantified using an immunohistochemical scoring system. RESULTS: In the intestinal metaplasia adjacent to the tumoral area, MUC2 was detected in 76 (97.4%) of 78 intestinal metaplasia, and MUC2 expression was inversely associated with the depth of wall penetration (P = 0.026) and tumor stage (P = 0.021). Although the expression rate of MUC2 antigens was higher in intestinal-type adenocarcinoma than in diffuse-type adenocarcinoma, a significant correlation with pathologic staging of the TNM system (pTNM staging) and MUC2 expression could not be found in each subtype of gastric carcinomas. CONCLUSION: The expression of MUC2 in intestinal metaplasia was higher in tumors of earlier stages. These findings suggest that increased MUC2 expression in intestinal metaplasia in the neighborhood of the carcinomas may play an important role in gastric carcinomas. Further investigations regarding the role of MUC2 expression in gastric carcinoma and background mucosae are necessary.